Saturday, December 30, 2006

I can't help it...

...the yanq is a yank, after all...

...and though this blog is not very political or terribly yanqui-centric, I cannot let this pass without comment.

¿What in the hell were the leaders of the old country thinking?

No one remembers why we invaded Iraq. No one knows why we are still there.

And now we have hung their president.

It doesn't matter what your views are concerning capital punishment. What matters is your view as to what constitutes justice.

Was he a son-of-a bitch? Sure. But so am I and so are you.

Did he systematically murder innocent people in the course of his insane cause? Yes. But so have the people that sent him to the gallows.

Why was this man not sent to the Hague? Is international justice not good enough?

Don't speak to me of Nuremberg. That man got nothing remotely resembling Borman, Göring or Hess. The days when we fought fascism are long gone.

Read Juan Cole:

"Dec. 30, 2006 | The body of Saddam, as it swung from the gallows at 6 a.m. Saturday Baghdad time, cast an ominous shadow over Iraq. The execution provoked intense questions about whether his trial was fair and about what the fallout will be. One thing is certain: The trial and execution of Saddam were about revenge, not justice. Instead of promoting national reconciliation, this act of revenge helped Saddam portray himself one last time as a symbol of Sunni Arab resistance, and became one more incitement to sectarian warfare.

Saddam Hussein was tried under the shadow of a foreign military occupation, by a government full of his personal enemies. The first judge, an ethnic Kurd, resigned because of government interference in the trial; the judge who took his place was also Kurdish and had grievances against the accused. Three of Saddam's defense lawyers were shot down in cold blood. The surviving members of his defense team went on strike to protest the lack of protection afforded them. The court then appointed new lawyers who had no expertise in international law. Most of the witnesses against Saddam gave hearsay evidence. The trial ground slowly but certainly toward the inevitable death verdict...

...The tribunal also had a unique sense of timing when choosing the day for Saddam's hanging. It was a slap in the face to Sunni Arabs. This weekend marks Eid al-Adha, the Holy Day of Sacrifice, on which Muslims commemorate the willingness of Abraham to sacrifice his son for God. Shiites celebrate it Sunday. Sunnis celebrate it Saturday –- and Iraqi law forbids executing the condemned on a major holiday. Hanging Saddam on Saturday was perceived by Sunni Arabs as the act of a Shiite government that had accepted the Shiite ritual calendar."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Otro día negro para la raza humana.
Juan

Veronica Salvetti McGinty said...

The hanging of Saddam, just added more wood into the fire imho. There will never be peace in this countries until the differences between shiites and sunnis are sorted out somehow ( killing people in either group just doesn´t seem to be the way ) After his death, he becomes a martyr and not a tyran. The judges have not been brilliant here really, and the cherry on top of this is that since the US was involved, it is again in the middle of the problem. Dying fast and painless is NOT a punishment! Death is not a punishment, christians, jews, muslims, we all know it.
Vero

Veronica Salvetti McGinty said...

I happened to go through a very interesting comment on the matter on a rpogrammers forum I usually visit, it is worth a read and comment:

¨The funny thing is in this day and age Saddam was possibly one of the better leaders the US could have in the region. One of the few that didn't believe (Iran) or promote (Saudi) Islamic fanaticism, that didn't have a legal process dominated by Sharia law but instead a Westernized legal system, making Iraq the only country in the Persian Gulf region not ruled according to Islamic law. He wasn't a pretty leader, but it never really seemed like a logical step in the War on Terror by any stretch of the imagination. I think it's very telling that his executioners shouted Muqtada Muqtada Muqtada in support of the radical Islamist Shia Cleric as they strung him up. Yet another 'Islamic Republic' in the making.¨

yanqui mike said...

Yep. There's a theory that's been going around that the whole invasion was quietly instigated behind the scenes by the Iranians.

I have no idea...but if you look at who will enormously benefit from the results Iran couldn't have done it better if they had done it themselves.

Mike

Anonymous said...

man this thread is freaky - hey Mike - are you and I such son-of-a-bitch's that we killed close to a half million people to get our thrills? Dude , Vero, and the rest - I suggest getting off the bandwagon and taking a reality check - yes war and killing is no fun, but this dude would have qualified for capital punishment in any first world country that allows it. The countries that don't simply havn't had enough decision makers feel and absorb the pain from such inhumanity. Duh.